Enigma Vault NoPII and Portkey both sit between your application and the LLM provider and can keep names, emails, and account numbers out of your prompts.
Portkey is a full-featured AI gateway with routing, observability, caching, and 60+ guardrails including PII redaction, whereas Enigma Vault NoPII does one thing: deterministic PII tokenization for LLM traffic, with real values restored in the response. The question is whether your PII protection needs a dedicated solution or a gateway feature.
This guide compares Enigma Vault NoPII and Portkey, now Palo Alto Networks’ Prisma AIRS AI Gateway, on architecture, features, pricing, compliance, and reviews.
Enigma Vault NoPII vs Portkey at a Glance
| Vendor | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey (Prisma AIRS AI Gateway) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams that need PII out of their own app’s LLM calls without losing context | Teams that need one gateway for many models, with routing, caching, and observability |
| What it does with PII | Tokenizes it, then restores real values in the response | Redacts it with placeholders; its docs say this is irreversible |
| Entry price | Free, then $49/mo | Free Developer plan; Production $49/mo |
| Free option | Lite: 1M protected tokens a month, no card, no expiry | Developer: 10,000 logs a month, labelled not for production |
| Deployment | Managed cloud; self-hosted edition on Enterprise | Hosted; open-source gateway; private cloud or VPC on Enterprise |
| G2 | 5/5 (1) | 4.6/5 (18) |
| Next step | One million protected tokens a month free. No card needed. |
Figures are as of 10 November 2026, from each vendor’s own site and docs, and from G2 and Capterra. For more options, see our list of the best PII tokenization software for LLMs.
Enigma Vault NoPII vs Portkey: Quick Verdict
Enigma Vault NoPII: A hosted privacy proxy for LLM APIs. You change your model client’s base URL, and Enigma Vault NoPII swaps PII, secrets, and API keys for consistent tokens before the request reaches the model provider, then restores the real values in the response. It fronts 9 providers, is free for one million protected tokens a month, and runs on Enigma Vault’s platform, which is PCI DSS Level 1 and SOC 2 Type II.
Portkey: An AI gateway with a unified API across many models, plus fallbacks, load balancing, caching, budgets, observability, an MCP gateway, and a guardrails framework. PII redaction is one of those guardrails, and its docs describe it as one-way. Portkey was acquired by Palo Alto Networks in May 2026.
I’d point you to Enigma Vault NoPII first if the job is keeping customer data out of what your model provider sees:
- You need the model’s answer to come back with the real names and numbers in it, not placeholders.
- You want the same customer to map to the same token across a conversation, so the model can still reason about who is who.
- You want a log your auditor can read that never stores plaintext, and erasure by token purge.
- You want to prove it on real traffic for free before you talk to anyone.
Portkey’s real strength is everything around the model call: routing across providers, retries and fallbacks, caching, cost tracking, and one place to see every request. It matters most if you’re running many models and teams and need a control plane for all of them, with PII redaction as a checkbox rather than the main job.
Enigma Vault NoPII changes one line in your model client. Detection, tokenization, restore, and the fail-closed block are identical on every plan, including the free Lite tier.
- Choose Enigma Vault NoPII if: PII protection is the requirement, your app needs real values back in responses, and you want a published price and a free tier to test with.
- Choose Portkey if: You need a full AI gateway for many models and teams, and one-way redaction of a handful of PII types is enough for your use case.
Verdict: Portkey manages your LLM traffic, whereas Enigma Vault NoPII protects the personal data inside it. If the question is how to keep PII from the model provider without breaking your AI feature, Enigma Vault NoPII answers it more directly.
Privacy Proxy or AI Gateway: How Enigma Vault NoPII and Portkey Differ at the Core
Enigma Vault NoPII is built around one task, which is swapping sensitive values for tokens and swapping them back, while Portkey is built around managing model traffic, with guardrails that can check or change a request on the way through.
To make it concrete, follow one support message on its way to an LLM.
| Step | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Your app sends a ticket with a name, email, and card number | The request goes to the Enigma Vault NoPII base URL with your provider key, as usual | The request goes to the Portkey gateway with a config that names the guardrails to run |
| 2. The model receives | Consistent tokens: the same customer maps to the same token across the conversation | Placeholders such as {{EMAIL_ADDRESS_1}}, if a redaction guardrail is turned on |
| 3. The reply comes back | Real values restored in the response, including streamed output | The placeholders stay; Portkey’s docs describe no restore step |
| 4. If detection fails | The request is blocked; this is not a setting | Set per guardrail in your Portkey config |
| 5. What you can audit | Token, masked value, entity type, confidence, session, provider, model, and time; never plaintext | Request logs and guardrail verdicts in the observability dashboard |
| Next step | Portkey’s free Developer plan includes basic guardrails only. |
Enigma Vault NoPII’s Architecture: A reverse proxy in front of the provider’s API. There is no Enigma Vault NoPII SDK and no Enigma Vault NoPII API key; it identifies your account from the provider key already in the request and stores only a hash of it.
Portkey’s Architecture: A gateway that sits between your app and many providers, applying routing rules, caches, budgets, and guardrails defined in a config. PII redaction is a toggle on a guardrail, or a partner integration such as AWS Bedrock Guardrails, Azure, or Pangea.
Tokenization vs Redaction: What Reaches the Model and What Comes Back
This is the difference that decides whether your AI feature still works. Here is one prompt as each product would handle it, based on each vendor’s documented behavior.
| Stage | What happens |
|---|---|
| Original prompt | “Draft a refund email to Maria Lopez (maria@example.com). Maria was charged twice.” |
| Sent by Enigma Vault NoPII | Maria’s name and email become tokens, and both mentions of Maria get the same name token, so the model still knows it is one person. |
| Sent by Portkey with redaction on | Maria’s email becomes {{EMAIL_ADDRESS_1}}, with numbered placeholders for other detected values. |
| Returned by Enigma Vault NoPII | A draft addressed to Maria Lopez at maria@example.com, with the real values restored before your app sees it. |
| Returned through Portkey | A draft containing the placeholders, which your own code would have to replace, with no mapping documented by Portkey. |
Redaction is the right call when you never need the values back, for example when you are only classifying a ticket. Tokenization is the right call when the answer has to go back to a customer or into a system of record. Our guide to tokenization vs masking vs redaction for AI covers the trade-off in depth.
Enigma Vault NoPII also neutralizes context phrases that can trigger model safety refusals, so a prompt about a patient or a lawsuit is less likely to be refused once its identifiers are tokenized.
Context Phrase Neutralization: Why Redacted Prompts Get Refused
Removing a value is only half the job. If the words around it still say “social security number,” models can recognize a sensitive category and refuse the request. Enigma Vault NoPII rewrites those labels in the proxy, while Portkey’s docs describe value replacement only.
| Label in your prompt | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey PII redaction |
|---|---|---|
| social security number | Rewritten to “ID number” | Label kept; the number becomes a placeholder |
| credit card number | Rewritten to “account number” | Label kept; the number becomes a placeholder |
| date of birth | Rewritten to “date” | Label kept; no date placeholder in the pre-built check |
| passport number | Rewritten to “document number” | Label kept; needs a regex or partner guardrail |
| The value itself | A consistent token, restored in the response | A placeholder such as {{EMAIL_ADDRESS_1}}, not restored |
| Next step | Bring a prompt that gets refused today and compare the two outputs. |
Portkey’s pre-built PII check covers phone, email, location, IP address, SSN, names, and credit card, so dates and passport numbers need your own rules. If refusals or missing types are a problem in your redacted prompts, this is the difference to test.
Enigma Vault NoPII and Portkey Features Side by Side
Compare Enigma Vault NoPII and Portkey on PII handling, LLM guardrails, detection, streaming, agents, gateway features, and deployment. Enigma Vault NoPII goes deep on protecting personal data in LLM traffic, whereas Portkey goes wide on managing that traffic.
| Feature | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| PII handling | Reversible, deterministic tokenization | One-way redaction with placeholders |
| Restore values in responses | Automatic, including streamed output | Not documented |
| Built-in PII types | 11 on by default, 25+ opt-in per workspace | Phone, email, location, IP address, SSN, names, and credit card |
| Secrets and API keys | 14 credential pattern families, same pass | Through regex or partner guardrails |
| Custom terms | 25 to 500 by plan | Regex match guardrails |
| Partner detectors | Not offered | AWS Bedrock, Azure, Pangea, Patronus, and others |
| Streaming | Tokens replaced on the fly as chunks arrive | Output guardrails run after the stream ends, informational only |
| Agents and tool calls | Detection on tool-call arguments and tool results | MCP gateway for auth, access, and observability |
| Embeddings | Embeddings endpoint tokenized the same way as chat | Routed through the gateway |
| Failure behavior | Fail-closed block, always | Configurable per guardrail |
| Providers | 9 providers, plus LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, LiteLLM, and Vercel AI SDK | Marketed as 1,600+ LLMs |
| Routing, fallbacks, and caching | Not offered | Included |
| Cost tracking and budgets | Not offered | Included |
| Images, audio, and files | Not covered (text only) | Depends on the partner guardrail |
| Audit log | PII-specific log, never plaintext; 7 days on Lite to unlimited on Enterprise | Request logs; 3 days on Developer, 30 on Production |
| Deployment | Managed; self-hosted on Enterprise | Hosted; MIT open-source gateway; VPC on Enterprise |
| Next step | Portkey’s pages give different model counts: 1,600+ on its homepage and 250+ in its GitHub README. |
Here is how the biggest differences play out in practice.
Where Enigma Vault NoPII and Portkey Differ in Practice
PII Detection and Entity Coverage
Portkey’s built-in PII guardrail covers seven types: phone number, email, location, IP address, SSN, names, and credit card. Its docs say these patterns are standardized and not customizable for the pre-built check, though you can add your own regex rules or call a partner such as Azure or AWS Bedrock Guardrails.
Enigma Vault NoPII turns on 11 entity types by default and lets you switch on more than 25 others per workspace, including regional identifiers. It checks checksums where the format allows, catches 14 families of credentials in the same pass, and lets you add 25 to 500 custom terms depending on plan.
Restoring Real Values in Responses
Portkey’s PII redaction docs say redaction is irreversible by design and the transformation is one-way. If your feature writes a reply to a customer, your own code has to put the values back, and Portkey documents no mapping to do it with.
Enigma Vault NoPII keeps a mapping in Enigma Vault and restores the real values in the response before your app sees it. Real values are revealed only to the end user who created the token, within their own session, under a time-boxed reveal grant, or to a server key with an opt-in scope, and every reveal attempt is logged.
Streaming Responses
Portkey’s guardrails docs say input guardrails run before the stream starts, while output guardrails run on the full response after the stream completes and take no action, so their results are informational only.
Enigma Vault NoPII replaces tokens as each chunk arrives, so latency impact stays small even on long completions. Tool-call arguments are buffered until the call completes and released as one piece, so a token split across chunks never breaks the JSON your agent is parsing.
Agents, Tool Calls, and MCP
Portkey offers an MCP gateway that centralizes authentication, access, and observability for MCP servers. That is valuable if you run many agents against many tools.
Enigma Vault NoPII is not an MCP gateway. It runs detection on message content, system prompts, tool-call arguments, and tool results, so an agent that reads a ticket and calls a CRM never sends the customer’s details to the model provider in either direction.
Routing, Caching, Fallbacks, and Observability
This is Portkey’s home ground. It offers a unified API, automatic fallbacks, load balancing, retries, simple and semantic caching, budgets, rate limits, and a dashboard that reviewers on G2 single out. Enigma Vault NoPII does none of this; it fronts 9 providers and keeps your privacy controls the same when you switch between them.
Enigma Vault NoPII does support tracing: Langfuse tracing on Growth and above records tokenized content only, and Enigma Vault NoPII honors the W3C traceparent header for OpenTelemetry.
Deployment and Self-Hosting
Portkey’s gateway is open source under the MIT license, and you can run it yourself for free. Its GitHub README lists PII redaction under the enterprise version, though, and Enterprise adds private cloud, VPC hosting, and data isolation.
Enigma Vault NoPII runs as NoPII Cloud on every plan. The self-hosted edition runs the proxy and vault inside your own environment under an annual Enterprise license with no token meter.
What Portkey’s Own PII Docs Say
Portkey does not publish a comparison page against Enigma Vault NoPII, so the fairest view of its PII features is its own documentation. Here is what it says, in plain terms.
- Redaction Is One-Way: The docs say redaction is irreversible by design. That suits logging and classification, and it does not suit replies that must contain real values.
- Pre-Built Patterns Are Fixed: The docs say redaction patterns are not customizable for the pre-built guardrail, though regex rules can be added.
- Detect Is Not Redact: The Pro “Detect PII” check returns a yes or no verdict. Changing the request requires a redaction guardrail.
- Plan Limits Apply: The guardrails docs give the free Developer plan basic, deterministic checks only, with partner and Pro guardrails on Production and Enterprise.
- Streaming Output Is Monitored, Not Changed: Output guardrail results on streamed responses are informational.
Portkey’s guardrail counts also vary across its pages, from 20+ deterministic checks in the docs to 60+ guardrails on its features page, so ask which ones apply to PII on your plan.
Portkey After the Palo Alto Networks Acquisition
Palo Alto Networks completed its acquisition of Portkey on 29 May 2026 and announced general availability of Prisma AIRS AI Gateway on 16 July 2026. Here is what that means if you are evaluating it now.
| What changed | What it means for you |
|---|---|
| Portkey’s pages now say Portkey is Prisma AIRS AI Gateway | Contracts, support, and roadmap now run through Palo Alto Networks |
| Runtime inspection is powered by Prisma AIRS | The gateway is becoming part of a larger security platform |
| The portkey.ai pricing page still lists Developer, Production, and Enterprise | Ask whether self-serve plans and prices will stay the same |
| G2 now lists Palo Alto Networks as the vendor | Reviews written before the deal describe the startup product |
For a large company already on Palo Alto Networks, that may be welcome. For a small team that chose Portkey as a startup tool, it is worth asking about pricing and roadmap before renewal.
Why Not Build It on Portkey’s Open-Source Gateway?
Portkey’s gateway is MIT-licensed, so some teams plan to add their own tokenization around it. That is possible, and here is what the build involves.
| Piece you would build | What it must do | In Enigma Vault NoPII |
|---|---|---|
| Detection library | Find PII and secrets across regions and languages | 11 types on by default, 25+ opt-in, 14 credential families |
| Token vault | Store mappings with per-customer keys and expiry | Enigma Vault, AES-256, token retention by plan |
| Proxy layer | Swap values both ways, including streams and tool calls | Built in, fail-closed on any error |
| Admin console | Entity settings, keys, workspaces, and roles | Dashboard, PII settings, and live playground |
| Audit logging | Prove what was protected without storing plaintext | Token, masked value, entity, confidence, provider, and model |
Each piece works on its own, and the seams between them are where data leaks. Enigma Vault NoPII replaces the whole build with a base-URL change, maintained as a product rather than a backlog item.
Enigma Vault NoPII vs Portkey Pricing
Enigma Vault NoPII Plans and Prices
Enigma Vault NoPII bills on protected tokens, which means everything in a request or response that flows through the proxy. Every plan includes every provider, detection, tokenization, restore, and the audit trail.
| Enigma Vault NoPII plan | What you get |
|---|---|
| Lite, free | 1M protected tokens a month, hard cap, no card; 1-day token retention; 7-day log history |
| Starter, $49/mo ($550/yr) | 50M tokens, then $1.00 per million; 30-day retention; browser SDK |
| Growth, $249/mo ($2,700/yr) | 500M tokens, then $0.80 per million; workspaces, 5 users, Langfuse, CSV log export |
| Business, $499/mo ($5,500/yr) | 2B tokens, then $0.60 per million; SSO, reveal grants, staff access log |
| Enterprise, custom | Custom token band and retention, SLA, BAA, and the self-hosted edition |
Start on Lite with real traffic, then upgrade in the console. | |
How Portkey Prices Its Plans
Portkey bills on recorded logs, and its pricing page lists four options. Exceeding a log limit does not block requests; logs past the limit are simply not recorded.
- Open Source: Free to host yourself, with community support.
- Developer: Free, 10,000 recorded logs a month, 3 days of log retention, basic guardrails only, and labelled not suitable for production.
- Production: $49 a month for 100,000 recorded logs, plus $9 per additional 100,000, with 30 days of log retention.
- Enterprise: Custom, with 10 million or more logs, custom retention, VPC hosting, SSO, and custom BAAs.
Capterra lists Portkey as contact the vendor for pricing, with no free trial.
Enigma Vault NoPII vs Portkey Cost at Four Stages
| Stage | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Trying it out | Lite: 1M protected tokens a month, full PII protection | Developer: free, basic guardrails only |
| First production feature | $49/mo (Starter, 50M tokens) | $49/mo (Production, 100,000 logs) |
| Growing workload | $249/mo (Growth, 500M tokens) | $49/mo plus $9 per extra 100,000 logs |
| Large or regulated deployment | $499/mo (Business), or Enterprise with self-hosting and a BAA | Enterprise quote, with VPC and custom BAAs |
| Next step | The units differ: protected tokens against recorded logs. Run your own traffic through each. |
How to Read This Table: Portkey counts logged requests and Enigma Vault NoPII counts the tokens that pass through it, so the rows show stage, not equal volume. The prices also buy different things: Portkey’s $49 buys a gateway, whereas Enigma Vault NoPII’s $49 buys reversible PII protection.
The Practical Takeaway: If your team needs to prove PII protection on real traffic this week, Enigma Vault NoPII’s free Lite tier includes the full protection, while Portkey’s free plan limits you to basic guardrails and is not meant for production. If you need a gateway anyway, price Portkey for the gateway, then judge whether one-way redaction is enough.
Enigma Vault NoPII vs Portkey Security and Compliance
Enigma Vault NoPII runs on Enigma Vault’s platform, which is PCI DSS Level 1 and SOC 2 Type II, and a BAA is available on Enigma Vault NoPII Enterprise. Portkey lists SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA on its pricing and security pages, with custom BAAs on Enterprise.
| Control | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Type II (Enigma Vault platform) | Type 2, stated on its pricing page |
| ISO 27001 | In progress | Stated on its pricing page |
| PCI DSS | Level 1 Service Provider (Card, Data, File Vault in scope) | Not listed |
| HIPAA and BAA | BAA on Enterprise | HIPAA listed; custom BAAs on Enterprise |
| GDPR erasure | Token purge, with the proof kept in the log | GDPR listed |
| Plaintext in logs | Never written | Depends on your logging configuration |
| Next step | Ask whether Portkey’s certifications carry over under Palo Alto Networks. |
Portkey holds ISO 27001 by its own account and Enigma Vault NoPII’s is still in progress, so if ISO 27001 is a hard requirement today, ask both for the certificate. Either way, request the audit documents under NDA before you send production data.
Enigma Vault NoPII vs Portkey Reviews on G2 and Capterra
| Source | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | 5/5 from 1 review | 4.6/5 from 18 reviews |
| Capterra | No listing | Listed, no reviews |
| Most praised | Context kept after tokenization, two-line setup | One gateway for many models, dashboard, observability |
| Most criticized | The interface | Learning curve, documentation, and analytics gaps |
| Next step | One review is not a sample. Test detection on your own prompts. |
Praise and Complaints From Portkey Users
Reviewers on G2 like having a single gateway to many models, a dashboard that makes monitoring straightforward, and structure in what one calls a chaotic part of building AI products. One mentions guardrails as a reason they chose it.
On the critical side, reviewers describe a learning curve for teams new to LLMOps, documentation gaps, missing advanced analytics, no easy data export from the dashboard, and pricing that one finds high for smaller teams.
Feedback on Enigma Vault NoPII
The one G2 reviewer values that tokenization solves the context loss of AI redaction and that setup took two lines of code, and finds the interface clunky. One review is not a sample, so the better evidence is the free tier on your own traffic.
Enigma Vault NoPII or Portkey by Company Size and Team Setup
The better fit depends less on industry than on how many models and teams you run, and whether the answer has to come back with real values in it.
| Company stage | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Seed-stage startup with one AI feature | Best fit: free Lite tier, two lines of code, full PII protection from day one | Free Developer plan has basic guardrails only and is not meant for production |
| Series A to C SaaS facing customer security reviews | Best fit: $49 to $249 a month, a plaintext-free audit log to show reviewers, and real values back in replies | $49 Production plan if you also need routing and caching; redaction stays one-way |
| Mid-market company with several AI products | Workspaces per product, roles, and Langfuse tracing on Growth | Best fit if most of the pain is model sprawl, budgets, and fallbacks |
| Enterprise platform team serving many business units | Business or Enterprise for SSO, reveal grants, and self-hosting | Best fit for a central gateway, now backed by Palo Alto Networks |
| Next step | Company size is a starting point; your data path decides the rest. |
Single-Product Teams
If one engineering team owns one AI feature, a gateway adds moving parts you may not need. Enigma Vault NoPII protects that feature’s traffic with no new SDK, and you can read what was caught in the first week of logs.
Best fit: Enigma Vault NoPII.
Platform Teams Running Many Models
Portkey gives a platform team one API across many providers, with fallbacks, caching, budgets, and a dashboard that its G2 reviewers rate highly. Enigma Vault NoPII fronts 9 providers and offers none of the gateway features, so on model management alone Portkey is ahead.
The test is whether any of those apps must return real customer values. If they must, Portkey’s one-way redaction cannot restore them, and that single requirement decides it.
Best fit: Portkey, unless your apps must return real customer values, in which case Enigma Vault NoPII.
Regulated Industries With an Auditor
Healthcare, legal, insurance, and financial teams are asked to prove what reached the provider. Enigma Vault NoPII’s log stores the token and a masked value, never plaintext, and a BAA is available on Enterprise. Portkey lists HIPAA with custom BAAs on Enterprise, so the deciding factor is whether you need values restored. Our guide to PII protection for LLMs in healthcare covers the healthcare case.
Best fit: Enigma Vault NoPII.
Questions to Ask Before You Choose Enigma Vault NoPII or Portkey
Bring these to both vendors. The answers shown are what each publishes today, so you can see where a sales call is needed.
| Question | Enigma VaultNoPII | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Will my app get real values back? | Yes, restored in every response | Ask; its docs say redaction is irreversible |
| Which PII types are covered on my plan? | The same detection on every plan, including free | Ask which guardrails your plan includes |
| What happens to streamed output? | Tokens replaced as chunks arrive | Output guardrails are informational on streams |
| What happens if detection fails? | The request is blocked | Set per guardrail; ask for the default |
| Who will support us next year? | Enigma Vault | Ask how support and pricing change under Palo Alto Networks |
| How do we leave? | Ask for the export process in writing | Ask for the export process in writing |
| Next step | Put the same questions to both vendors. |
Moving From Portkey Guardrails to Enigma Vault NoPII
If one-way redaction is breaking replies that need real values, the move is a change in where your requests go, so plan it before you turn anything off.
- List Where Redaction Runs: Find every Portkey config with a PII guardrail, and every place your code tries to fill placeholders back in.
- Check What You Rely On: If you use Portkey for routing, caching, or budgets, decide whether you still need a gateway for those jobs.
- Route One Provider First: Point one model client at the Enigma Vault NoPII base URL and compare what reaches the provider in the audit log.
- Run Both for a Few Weeks: Then cut over.
If you want help mapping your AI data path, book a migration call, or read our guide to LLM privacy proxies.
Final Verdict: Enigma Vault NoPII or Portkey?
Portkey is a capable AI gateway, and if you need routing, caching, budgets, and observability across many models, it belongs on your shortlist. I would tell you that directly. Its PII redaction is one guardrail among many, and its own docs say it cannot be reversed.
If what you need is to keep customer PII from the model provider without breaking the answer your users see, Enigma Vault NoPII does that with a base-URL change, a price you can read, and a free tier that does not expire. It is not a gateway, and it does not scan images, audio, or files, so if your project depends on those, look elsewhere.
See it on your own data: try the Enigma Vault NoPII live demo or compare plans and start free.
See what reaches your model provider.
Book a demo to map your AI data path, or explore Enigma Vault NoPII first. The free tier covers one million protected tokens a month.
More comparisons: OpenAI privacy vs Enigma Vault NoPII, Protecto vs Skyflow, PII masking for LLMs, and the best AI data security software for enterprises.
How We Researched This Comparison
We checked every fact on 10 November 2026. Portkey facts come from portkey.ai, its pricing page, its guardrails and PII redaction docs, its GitHub repository, and Palo Alto Networks’ acquisition and launch announcements. Review data comes from G2 and Capterra, read live, and Enigma Vault NoPII facts come from our own product and pricing pages.
Enigma Vault publishes this page, so read it as a vendor-written comparison. Where Portkey is the stronger product, we say so. If something here is out of date, tell us through our contact page and we will check it.
